401k Information

401k Beneficiary Rules

Have you heard about a “stretch IRA” and wondered if it was some special kind of IRA? Well, it isn’t. In the simplest terms, a stretch IRA is an IRA that has a beneficiary designation that provides for the possibility of maintaining the tax deferred status of the IRA after the death of the IRA owner. You might be thinking, “I wish I had a stretch IRA. I only named my spouse as my primary beneficiary and my kids as my successor or contingent beneficiary.” Well, guess what? You have a stretch IRA. After your death, your spouse and/or your children could continue to defer income taxes for many years after your death, as long as they are prudent and only take the annual minimum required distributions mandated by law.

While the “stretch” concept applies to some retirement plans, many heirs of 401k owners could be in for a rude awakening if their parents fail to plan properly.

With proper planning you can put in place the mechanisms to stretch taxable distributions from an inherited IRA and certain retirement plans for decades, sometimes as long as 80 years after the original owner dies. If, however, the employer’s retirement plan document stipulates the wrong provisions, the stretch may be replaced by a screaming income tax disaster. The heirs could be in for a tax nightmare if Dad never transferred his retirement plan into an IRA.

Many investors fail to realize that the specific plan rules that govern their individual 401k or other retirement plan take precedence over the IRS distribution rules for inherited IRAs or retirement plans.

The distribution rules that come into play at the death of the retirement plan owner are usually found in a plan document that few employees or advisors ever read. Many, if not most plan documents say that in the event of death, a non-spouse beneficiary must receive (and pay tax on) the entire balance of the retirement plan the year after the death of the retirement plan owner. These retirement plans don’t allow a non-spouse beneficiary to stretch distributions. For example, if there is a million balance, the non-spouse heir or heirs will have to pay income taxes on million. Then, the remaining balance, roughly 0,000 ( million minus the 0,000 immediate income tax hit) would be outside of the tax-deferred protection of an inherited IRA.

Had the 401k participants taken that money and transferred it into an IRA before he died, the non-spouse beneficiary would have been able to stretch the distributions based on his or her life expectancy. Failing to make the IRA transfer will result in an unnecessary massive income tax burden for the non-spouse beneficiary.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. QUESTION:
    Can the State court system give a ruling over the 401k?
    I have two parts to my question. My mom passed away. I need to collect her 401k. Me and my brother are the named beneficiary. The problem is she was still married to my brothers father at her time of death, and i havent seen him and my brother in 15 yrs. I dont have any information on how to contact him, Ive been asking my mom’s friend who knew him, Private investigators won’t be able to help me cause his name is too common, I asked the 401k people if i can make an affidavit of abandonment, they said it doesnt matter, ive sent out emails to people that have the same name, … yet i was unsuccessful. Is ther anyway that i can get a ruling over the 401k beneficiary/inheritance rule in the state courts system? Or is ther another way that i can proceed with this matter without having to hire lawyer?

    • ANSWER:
      You don’t need to hire a lawyer, but you will need to do a lot of research. State courts have subject matter jurisdiction over 401k matters…

  2. QUESTION:
    i’m 21 years old… who should i appoint as my beneficiary on my 401k ?
    not married.. no children.. I have a brother and sister and my parents. What is the general rule of thumb as to who i should appoint as my beneficiary? Can i always appoint somebody later (when i’m married and have kids) ?

    • ANSWER:

  3. QUESTION:
    How much asset should one have before considering trusts?
    Trusts, revocable or irrevocable are expensive! Is there a general rule of net worth/financial assets before one even considers doing this?

    Example, I have the following assets in NC and no where else:

    House – joint tenancy
    2 cars – both in my name
    Bank accounts – Joint
    Life insurance – we are owners of our own policy with each being beneficiary of the other’s policy.
    Company 401k – again, we are beneficiary of the other.

    And three beautiful children:

    Do we need to re-title to the trust and which one, revocable or irrevocable. What is the advantage of one over the other besides the ability to change and can’t change?

    Also on the house, since I am no longer owner does that mean the trust gets the 1098 and I cannot claim mortgage interest on my return??

    • ANSWER:
      I know you can take the deduction on the house. The big thing that you need is a will that stipulates who the children will go to if both parents die. A trust could have some advantages, but the estate should be relatively simple as is.